The death penalty is a
very long well thought out plan that has many aspects that are made to protect
the accused. In the pretrial the court makes sure that the jury is a fair well
educated jury. The reason for the long process of determining the jury is because
if the jury had a bias member or someone that had already pre-determined their
decision someone’s life will be taken away. Another way the accused can get
away with surviving is pleading insanity or a mental illness. If you were to
kill someone and diagnosed with mental retardation the court would protect you
from the death penalty. There are many ways the court will help provide the
accused with a fair trial. I think that this long methodical plan is a very
accurate way of protecting the rights of the accused. We could be much stricter
than we already are, but these rights provide the wrong with some fair
protection. There are five ways of using the death penalty they are hanging,
firing squad, lethal injection, gas chamber and electrocution and in my eyes I
find all of these ways more than fair. If you take someone’s life why your life
shouldn’t be taken? I understand that in some cases there are some
acceptations, but that’s up to the jury to decide. Also most of the killings
are very brutal and gruesome the way that these criminals are put to death are
quick and painless, so in my eyes they are having somewhat of a luxury. None of
these are considered cruel and unusual punishment in my mind, but I can see how
people can argue it. I think they get what they deserve. The state of Illinois
and some surrounding states don't have the death penalty. Surprisingly
California has the most amounts of inmates with 724. I was also surprised to
hear that they had the most women with 19 inmates. There are by far more male
inmates in the United States. In North Carolina in
2002, a new law allowed life without parole and because of this death sentences
dropped by over 50% following the law.
No comments:
Post a Comment