The death penalty is a
very long well thought out plan that has many aspects that are made to protect
the accused. In the pretrial the court makes sure that the jury is a fair well
educated jury. The reason for the long process of determining the jury is because
if the jury had a bias member or someone that had already pre-determined their
decision someone’s life will be taken away. Another way the accused can get
away with surviving is pleading insanity or a mental illness. If you were to
kill someone and diagnosed with mental retardation the court would protect you
from the death penalty. There are many ways the court will help provide the
accused with a fair trial. I think that this long methodical plan is a very
accurate way of protecting the rights of the accused. We could be much stricter
than we already are, but these rights provide the wrong with some fair
protection. There are five ways of using the death penalty they are hanging,
firing squad, lethal injection, gas chamber and electrocution and in my eyes I
find all of these ways more than fair. If you take someone’s life why your life
shouldn’t be taken? I understand that in some cases there are some
acceptations, but that’s up to the jury to decide. Also most of the killings
are very brutal and gruesome the way that these criminals are put to death are
quick and painless, so in my eyes they are having somewhat of a luxury. None of
these are considered cruel and unusual punishment in my mind, but I can see how
people can argue it. I think they get what they deserve. The state of Illinois
and some surrounding states don't have the death penalty. Surprisingly
California has the most amounts of inmates with 724. I was also surprised to
hear that they had the most women with 19 inmates. There are by far more male
inmates in the United States. In North Carolina in
2002, a new law allowed life without parole and because of this death sentences
dropped by over 50% following the law.
Followers
Tuesday, November 13, 2012
The Next Four Years
With the election over most people have accepted that Obama has won the election. It makes me intrigued and excited where he will bring the country in his next term. As what I like to call myself a fair critic I don’t think president Obamas first term was a successful one. I thought that the bright side of the his four years was the assassination of Osama. And I wish that the highlight was him getting us out of debt. I don’t see or understand how his plans that have not changed very much will make his next term more successful. What will president Obama do to get us out of this huge debt? He didn’t bring us out but dug us further into debt, but I am not positive that Governor Romney’s plans would have gotten us out of debt. It is a very controversial topic that truly needs to adapt. I want to see a president that is willing to accept that the other party might have some good plans. The democratic and republican parties are great but together I believe we could create a great plan to get us into positive ways again.
Tuesday, November 6, 2012
Next Four Years
With the election nearing close tensions among family and friends tend to get high. Most people can’t help to let themselves go and debate which candidate they approve of. Whatever ends up happening the week leading up to election I always ask myself what the next election is going to be like. I know we have plenty of worries to worry about but I always begin to wonder, what will happen? If president wins the election and we don’t see much progress like his last term than will the next president be a republican? If president Obama turns the economy around, will a under qualified democrat become president, because of his success? And if Governor Romney wins will his term be a success? Will he help the republican party retain office for years to come? All of these questions are impossible to answer in my mind. You won’t be able to determine this until the next four years are up.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)